Subscribe Share/Bookmark

Friday, April 30, 2010

World Cup Multilingual Campaigns

Optus to launch major brand campaign to promote World Cup


Optus will this Sunday launch a major brand campaign centred on its sponsorship of Football Federation Australia and its association as the mobile broadcaster of the 2010 FIFA World Cup.




The ads, created by M&C Saatchi, will feature Australian footballers, Lucas Neill and Tim Cahill.

Meanwhile, SBS will tonight launch an advertising campaign to promote its broadcast of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, featuring stories from fans around the world.

The multiplatform and multilingual campaign, developed by US Sydney, will focus on the global appeal of the event which kicks off on June 1.




Supreme Court Bi-lingual Issue in Canada


En francais, s'il vous plait -- and skip the translation

Here's a thought for those, like columnist Lorne Gunter, who are tremendously upset about Bill C-232, which would mandate that Supreme Court justices be fluently bilingual, so as to be able to hear cases in either of Canada's two official languages without simultaneous translation. Suppose that anglophones were the minority in this country, with French being Canada's most widely spoken official language. Suppose that French pundits across Canada were painting all kinds of doomsday scenarios because of a bill that would require Supreme Court justices to be fluently bilingual so they could hear cases in English without simultaneous translation. Now, suppose critics of the bill were arguing that the eligible candidates for a position on the Supreme Court would be coming overwhelmingly and unfairly from Alberta.
I can just picture the reverse outrage here in the West. Albertans would fume that they were being treated like second-class citizens -- and rightly so. But when circumstances conspire to make French-Canadians feel like second-class citizens, why is it perfectly acceptable?
Writing in the Herald on Tuesday, Gunter argued that Bill C-232, which has passed the House and gone to the Senate, would "restrict appointment to a very small number of bilingual legal scholars and lower-court judges." He claims this elite little cadre would be drawn mainly from "a narrow strip from Ottawa, through Montreal and Quebec City, and into Moncton." It would be difficult for Canadians outside that strip to "ever be appointed to the court that has the final say over how the charter will be interpreted and what rights we may have." Nonsense.
Gunter makes it sound as if the justice system west of the Manitoba-Ontario border is a vast unilingual prairie. I'm not sure how he can possibly know, or even guesstimate, the level of French fluency among all western Canadian judges. Is he personally acquainted with all of them? Has he ever heard of the illustrious Monnins of Winnipeg -- Michel of the Manitoba Court of Appeal, his father, Alfred, who also served on the appeal court, and his brother, Marc, chief justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba?
Sounds to me like Gunter's real worry is that more liberal-thinking folks from the East would be interpreting the charter in ways he, as someone who leans largely to the right, would not approve of.
I don't see why French-Canadians, whose taxes support the Supreme Court as much as do the taxes of anglophones, should be told that simultaneous translation is good enough for them, and they should shut up and live with it. Anyone who speaks more than one language knows that translation is never a word-for-word, black and white matter.
One need only pick up several versions of a classic foreign novel, such as Flaubert's Madame Bovary, or Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment, rendered by different translators into English, to see how widely translations can vary, and how the subtleties of phrases in other languages can be interpreted. You really have to know French or Russian fluently yourself so that you can read the works in their original language to grasp intuitively the sometimes untranslatable shades of meaning.
Senator Claudette Tardif made that same point when she told CTV that court interpretation could be good, but it's never perfect and that litigators have a right to have their first language used.
Tardif, who is from Edmonton and is bilingual and served as dean of the University of Alberta's faculty of French, said: "The stakes are too high when you're at the highest level of the land, your last court of appeal. That is an injustice that some citizens have to put up with, that others don't."
And she said, "We have to remember the Supreme Court, as a federal institution, has the mandate to serve the citizens of the land and not those aspiring to sit on the Supreme Court bench."
Tardif also neatly shoots down Gunter's fears of a narrow slate of candidates when she says that if passed, the bill "would send an important signal to different universities and faculties of law and they would certainly prepare the students accordingly."
Exactly. Even if the field were as narrow as Gunter claims, which is doubtful, it would widen over the years as the requirement for bilingualism was incorporated into law school curricula.
Among the bilingual current justices is Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, who hails from Pincher Creek -- far from Gunter's mythical strip of francophonie far to the east. Morris Fish -- a non-francophone name, if ever there was one -- taught a course called Les crimes economiques, at the University of Ottawa; and also taught Droit penal, at the Universite de Montreal. Thomas Cromwell, formerly of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, is fluently bilingual. Manitoban Marshall Rothstein is the only non-bilingual Supreme Court justice.
Justice needs to be seen to be done. It also needs to be heard -- and at the highest court in the land, it should be heard in both official languages without resorting to simultaneous translation.
French deserves equal status with English -- and that means more than relegating it to the other side of the Cheerios box.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Language Experiments


When Language Can Hold the Answer

Faced with pictures of odd clay creatures sporting prominent heads and pointy limbs, students at Carnegie Mellon were asked to identify which “aliens” were friendly and which were not.
The students were not told that the aliens fell naturally into two groups, although the differences were subtle and not easy to describe.
Some had somewhat lumpy, misshapen heads. Others had smoother domes. After students assigned each alien to a category, they were told whether they had guessed right or wrong, learning as they went that smooth heads were friendly and lumpy heads were not.
The experimenter, Dr. Gary Lupyan, who is now doing postdoctoral research at Cornell, added a little item of information to one test group. He told the group that previous subjects had found it helpful to label the aliens, calling the friendly ones “leebish” and the unfriendly ones “grecious,” or vice versa.
When the participants found out whether their choice was right or wrong, they were also shown the appropriate label. All the participants eventually learned the difference between the aliens, but the group using labels learned much faster. Naming, Dr. Lupyan concluded, helps to create mental categories.
The finding may not seem surprising, but it is fodder for one side in a traditional debate about language and perception, including the thinking that creates and names groups.
In stark form, the debate was: Does language shape what we perceive, a position associated with the late Benjamin Lee Whorf, or are our perceptions pure sensory impressions, immune to the arbitrary ways that language carves up the world?
The latest research changes the framework, perhaps the language of the debate, suggesting that language clearly affects some thinking as a special device added to an ancient mental skill set. Just as adding features to a cellphone or camera can backfire, language is not always helpful. For the most part, it enhances thinking. But it can trip us up, too.
The traditional subject of the tug of war over language and perception is color. Because languages divide the spectrum differently, researchers have asked whether language affected how people see color. English, for example, distinguishes blue from green. Most other languages do not make that distinction. Is it possible that only English speakers really see those colors as different?
Past investigations have had mixed results. Some experiments suggested that color terms influenced people in the moment of perception. Others suggested that the language effect kicked in only after some basic perception occurred.
The consensus was that different ways to label color probably did not affect the perception of color in any systematic way.
Last year, Lera Boroditsky and colleagues published a study in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences showing that language could significantly affect how quickly perceptions of color are categorized. Russian and English speakers were asked look at three blocks of color and say which two were the same.
Russian speakers must distinguish between lighter blues, or goluboy, and darker blues, siniy, while English speakers do not have to, using only “blue” for any shade. If the Russians were shown three blue squares with two goluboy and one siniy, or the other way around, they picked the two matching colors faster than if all three squares were shades from one blue group. English makes no fundamental distinction between shades of blue, and English speakers fared the same no matter the mix of shades.
In two different tests, subjects were asked to perform a nonverbal task at the same time as the color-matching task. When the Russians simultaneously carried out a nonverbal task, they kept their color-matching advantage. But when they had to perform a verbal task at the same time as color-matching, their advantage began to disappear. The slowdown suggested that the speed of their reactions did not result just from a learned difference but that language was actively involved in identifying colors as the test was happening. Two other recent studies also demonstrated an effect of language on color perception and provided a clue as to why previous experimental results have been inconclusive. In The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Dr. Paul Kay of the International Computer Science Institute at Berkeley and colleagues hypothesized that if language is dominant on the left side of the brain, it should affect color perception in the right visual field. (The right visual field is connected to the left side of the brain, and vice versa.)

To read more, please visit nytimes.com

Interpreting Jobs

2 German/English Interpreters needed for medical conference in Los Angeles

Dates: May 22nd
Time: ALL DAY

MUST have medical interpreting experience. Interpreters without this experience will not be considered.

Please email your resume to: info [at] worldlanguagecommunications [dot] com and also make sure to register on our website or you will not be considered.

In the subject line write: GERMAN MEDICAL INTERPRETER

You can register on our careers page on: www.worldlanguagecommunications.com

World Languages

Listening to (and Saving) the World’s Languages

James Estrin/The New York Times
Valnea Smilovic, 59, left, with her mother, 92, in Queens. They still speak Vlashki, a language spoken by the Istrians.
The chances of overhearing a conversation in Vlashki, a variant of Istro-Romanian, are greater in Queens than in the remote mountain villages in Croatia that immigrants now living in New York left years ago.
James Estrin/The New York Times
Husni Husain, 67, says he doesn’t know of any other person in New York who speaks Mamuju, an Austronesian language.
At a Roman Catholic church in the Morrisania section of the Bronx, Mass is said once a month inGarifuna, an Arawakan language that originated with descendants of African slaves shipwrecked near St. Vincent in the Caribbean and later exiled to Central America. Today, Garifuna is virtually as common in the Bronx and in Brooklyn as in Honduras and Belize.
And Rego Park, Queens, is home to Husni Husain, who, as far as he knows, is the only person in New York who speaks Mamuju, the Austronesian language he learned growing up in the Indonesian province of West Sulawesi. Mr. Husain, 67, has nobody to talk to, not even his wife or children.
“My wife is from Java, and my children were born in Jakarta — they don’t associate with the Mamuju,” he said. “I don’t read books in Mamuju. They don’t publish any. I only speak Mamuju when I go back or when I talk to my brother on the telephone.”
These are not just some of the languages that make New York the most linguistically diverse city in the world. They are part of a remarkable trove of endangered tongues that have taken root in New York — languages born in every corner of the globe and now more commonly heard in various corners of New York than anywhere else.
While there is no precise count, some experts believe New York is home to as many as 800 languages — far more than the 176 spoken by students in the city’s public schools or the 138 that residents of Queens, New York’s most diverse borough, listed on their 2000 census forms.
“It is the capital of language density in the world,” said Daniel Kaufman, an adjunct professor of linguistics at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. “We’re sitting in an endangerment hot spot where we are surrounded by languages that are not going to be around even in 20 or 30 years.”
In an effort to keep those voices alive, Professor Kaufman has helped start a project, the Endangered Language Alliance, to identify and record dying languages, many of which have no written alphabet, and encourage native speakers to teach them to compatriots.
“It’s hard to use a word like preserve with a language,” said Robert Holman, who teaches at Columbia and New York Universities and is working with Professor Kaufman on the alliance. “It’s not like putting jelly in a jar. A language is used. Language is consciousness. Everybody wants to speak English, but those lullabies that allow you to go to sleep at night and dream — that’s what we’re talking about.”
With national languages and English encroaching on the linguistic isolation of remote islands and villages, New York has become a Babel in reverse — a magnet for immigrants and their languages.
New York is such a rich laboratory for languages on the decline that the City University Graduate Center is organizing an endangered-languages program. “The quickening pace of language endangerment and extinction is viewed by many linguists as a direct consequence of globalization,” said Juliette Blevins, a linguist hired by City University to start the program.
In addition to dozens of Native American languages, vulnerable foreign languages that researchers say are spoken in New York include Aramaic, Chaldic and Mandaic from the Semitic family; Bukhari (a Bukharian Jewish language, which has more speakers in Queens than in Uzbekistan or Tajikistan); Chamorro (from the Mariana Islands); Irish Gaelic; Kashubian (from Poland); indigenous Mexican languages; Pennsylvania Dutch; Rhaeto-Romanic (spoken in Switzerland); Romany (from the Balkans); and Yiddish.
Researchers plan to canvass a tiny Afghan neighborhood in Flushing, Queens, for Ormuri, which is believed to be spoken by a small number of people in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The Endangered Language Alliance will apply field techniques usually employed in exotic and remote foreign locales as it starts its research in the city’s vibrant ethnic enclaves.
“Nobody had gone from area to area looking for endangered languages in New York City spoken by immigrant populations,” Professor Kaufman said.
The United Nations keeps an atlas of languages facing extinction, and experts there as well as linguists generally agree that a language will probably disappear in a generation or two when the population of native speakers is both too small and in decline. Language attrition has also been hastened by war, ethnic cleansing and compulsory schooling in a national tongue.
for full story, visit nytimes.com

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

D-Ariz Speaks to Washington Post about Arizona Immigration Bill


WashingtonPost.com

Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., speaks to thousands of protesters attending a rally at the Arizona Capitol voicing their displeasure on Sunday, April, 25, 2010, over the Friday bill signing of SB1070 by the Arizona governor, in Phoenix. The sweeping measure makes it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally, and would require local law enforcement to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are in the country illegally. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., speaks to thousands of protesters attending a rally at the Arizona Capitol voicing their displeasure on Sunday, April, 25, 2010, over the Friday bill signing of SB1070 by the Arizona governor, in Phoenix. The sweeping measure makes it a crime under state law to be in the country illegally, and would require local law enforcement to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are in the country illegally. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin) (Ross D. Franklin - AP)
Rep. Raul Grijalva
(D-Ariz.)
Wednesday, April 28, 2010; 12:30 PM
Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) was onlineWednesday, April 28, at 12:30 p.m. ET to discuss the growing conflict in Arizona against a bill that will make it a state crime to be an illegal immigrant in Arizona. The Democrat has asked the federal government not to cooperate when illegal immigrants are picked up by local police.
Video: Furor grows over Arizona's immigration law(AP)
____________________
Programming note: We have extended invitations to authorities who represent the other side of the immigration issue in Arizona. Please consult the Live Chats schedule.
Phoenix, Ariz.: How do you reconcile your commitment to uphold the Constitution as a member of Congress and yet suggest that federal authorities not enforce U.S. immigration law?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I have never said or suggested that federal immigration laws should not be enforced. I have suggested that federal law is a federal obligation and should not be delegated to local authorities.
_______________________
Washington, D.C.: An Arizona sheriff, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, has already announced that he won't uphold this law because it is, in his words, a "racist law." Even Tom Tancredo (!) thinks the law goes over the line. Is this law even going to live long enough to be enforced?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I believe that the legal challenges of the Constitutionality of this law will eventually overturn SB 1070.
_______________________
Annapolis, Md.: Other than amnesty, what is your solution to the illegal immigration problem? Another amnesty would only make the problem worse.
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I have never supported blanket amnesty. I have supported and still support a path to legalization, border security, additional funds to support enforcement in high drug trafficking areas, and other elements of a comprehensive solution. I co-sponsored HR 4321, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform ASAP bill.
_______________________
Washington, D.C.: Under the new law, what will happen to legal visitors, legal immigrants, or citizens who are stopped by the police but unable to produce any documentation of their status?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: The person would be subject to arrest, possible detention, and a $500 fine for not having the correct papers on demand.
_______________________
Portland, Ore.: Don't you realize that your proposal for a boycott of all things Arizona may well hurt the people who need help and support the most? As a frequent visitor to the Phoenix area, I can't help but notice that most service workers are Mexican or of Mexican descent. Fewer tourists add up to less jobs, which equals more misery. Would you reconsider?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I have not called for a general "boycott" of Arizona. I have called for a targeted ban on conventions and conferences in the state for a limited time. The idea is to send a message, not grind down the state economy.
_______________________
Minneapolis, Minn.: Representative Grijalva -- Thanks for taking questions today. Are you satisfied with the president's response to the passage of this law? Is there more you would like him to do or say?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I am encouraged by the president's instructions to the Department of Justice to investigate the Constitutionality and civil rights implications of the new law. Hopefully, this will lead the DOJ to seek an injunction against the law.
_______________________
Washington, D.C.: I know you're head of Progressive Caucus. Do you worry that since you played nice with Obama on health care, he might not do immigration reform? I would worry about it.
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I don't believe the president is ignoring the issue of immigration reform. The real impediment is members of Congress who are too afraid of the issue or those that seek to exploit it for political gain. That's the real problem.
_______________________
Anonymous: What provisions does the new immigration law have in it with regards to illegals who have resided in Arizona like more than five years and own businesses, homes and pay income taxes??
Thank you for your response.
Rep. Raul Grijalva: For the law-abiding, hard-working people that you describe, comprehensive reform would provide a path to legalization, which involves background checks, a waiting period, and a fee for processing. SB 1070, which we're discussing today, does not deal at all with the people you describe other than in an enforcement and detention capacity.
_______________________
Philadelphia, Pa.: Do you have any thoughts as to whether the Republican National Convention should consider being held in Phoenix?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: It certainly would fit nicely into the RNC's theme on immigrants.
_______________________
Rockville, Md.: Why don't you advocate enforcement of existing federal immigration laws so that states won't have to create their own in desperation? If laws against employers of illegals were enforced, most of the problem would go away.
Rep. Raul Grijalva: Employer sanctions under comprehensive reform would be an effective deterrent because all employees would be identified as legal and eligible for employment. Without comprehensive reform, we rely on a system in which employees work in the shadows, unseen and unreachable.
_______________________
Phoenix, Ariz.: How many of those commenting have actually read the AZ bill have actually read it. Do you think people really understand all of its parts? It seems to be that reactions to the bill are based on preconceived biases.
Rep. Raul Grijalva: Immigration has unfortunately become a gut reaction issue. SB 1070 upon reading will be more distasteful than one's original impression.
_______________________
Washington, D.C. (via Navajo Nation): What is your plan to get Arizona Indian Tribes aboard to end 1070?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: Opposition to SB 1070 has included Native nations. The racial profiling demand for Tribal identification will be reason enough for more tribes to oppose it.
_______________________
North Manchester, Ind.: Please explain why illegal immigrants should not be subject to our border laws. If I am in England illegally, they have every right to toss me out until I can do the right thing and provide documentation that I have respected their rules. What in your argument am I missing?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I am not implying that immigration laws should not be enforced. Your assumption is that I believe the opposite, which is wrong. My opposition to SB 1070 is based on Constitutional concerns.
_______________________
Detroit, Mich.: Given concerns over the state of the national debt, how are members of both parties proposing to pay for their immigration proposals? I find it hard to stomach complaints about our debt when the same people propose building a giant and expensive fence.
Rep. Raul Grijalva: The immigration reform bill presently in the House requires the payment of a fee for those who are undocumented. This fund would pay for the processing of applications, which is the key expense. The irony about the fence is that despite its ineffectiveness and cost overruns, it remains a rallying cry for people who think they're solving the problem. It's simplistic and doesn't do what proponents think it does.
_______________________
Belfast, U.K.: I don't understand the logic behind an earned pathway to citizenship for those who have broken the rules. How is this fair when faced against many others who would like to come to the United States, from Ireland for example, who pursue legal means of entry?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: One of the largest groups of undocumented are the Irish and Eastern bloc residents. They too would benefit from an earned path to legalization. They would have to get at the back of the line and wait with every other undocumented group, but they would have the opportunities they deserve and don't have now.
_______________________
San Francisco, Calif.: I agree that this law goes way over the line. However, as a resident of another very strained border state, I sympathize a bit with the frustration of the people of Arizona, which led to this overreaction. What do you suggest as a more reasonable way to deal with the huge numbers of illegal immigrants coming into our country?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: Dealing with migration to this country from Latin America will require the United States to have a real strategy to build capacity in the region, including economic development, humanitarian assistance, and education. I am convinced that people come here driven by poverty and hunger, not malice or greed. They would remain home if they could sustain their families there. This has to become an essential part of reform.
_______________________
Arlington, Va.: I was quite stunned this morning to hear John McCain blame the immigration law on President Obama for "failing to protect our borders."
How can he honestly lay the blame for this at the president's doorstep?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: For eight years or more, the Republicans have been funding and promoting "border security" -- troops on the border, more Border Patrol agents, fences, detention centers, virtual fences -- and we still have the same issue before us. For them or McCain in particular to blame those who are trying to deal with this complex issue now is the height of hypocrisy. While Sen. McCain was a maverick he promoted comprehensive immigration reform, and now as a Tea Party convert mimics his primary opponent J. D. Hayworth. This for me calls anything he says into question.
_______________________
Apache Junction, Ariz.: What exactly do you propose as a solution to illegal immigration in Arizona? Do you view illegal immigration as just that, the people breaking the law of the U.S.?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: As I've stated before countless times, I support comprehensive immigration reform as a key to dealing with unauthorized entries. I see undocumented immigrants as committing a civil infraction, which is stated in present immigration law.
_______________________
Rochester, N.Y.: Is it true that if police stop someone under the new AZ law, and that person simply declares himself to be a citizen, the police can't demand ID from him or her?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: Under the new law, if police have "reasonable suspicion" that the person is an undocumented immigrant, they can demand proof. Refusing to provide it will not end the conversation.
_______________________
Virginia: I lived in Latin America most of my life, speak Spanish fluently, and love its music, culture, and people. My Hispanic friends and I support enforcing Arizona law. Does that make us racists?
Rep. Raul Grijalva: I'm glad you like the music. No, you're not a racist. However, you might want to protect your Constitutional rights by opposing this law.

New subtitle service kicks off

From JoonGangdaily April 29, 2010
If you’re a foreign national in Korea, it can be difficult to find a place to watch a first-run Korean film with English subtitles. There are a few organizations and a handful of movie theaters that do screen these films with subtitles. But the screening times can be limited and the locations not always convenient.

That’s about to change, as the number of theaters offering screenings with subtitles is soon set to increase.

To meet foreign residents’ growing demand for greater access to cultural life, the Seoul Metropolitan Government and CGV, a local theater chain, will screen 20 Korean films with English subtitles starting today, the city government said in a statement yesterday.

The expansion of the English subtitle service is aimed at promoting Korean film among foreign residents in the country.

The service was first introduced last year, when 10 Korean films were screened with English subtitles at two theaters in Seoul, drawing about 20,000 foreign visitors, the release said.

This year, four CGV theaters were added, with locations in Gangnam, Yongsan, Myeongdong and Guro.

“These four theaters are located in places where there is a large expat population,” said Kim Dae-hee, an official at CGV who is in charge of promoting the English subtitle service.

“We also hope this service will appeal to Korean students who want to learn English,” Kim added.

“Blades of Blood,” which opens at theaters nationwide today, will be the first film screened as part of the expanded service.

Blades of Blood, directed by Lee Joon-ik (“The King and The Clown”) is a period film set in the Joseon Dynasty (1392-1910). “Maid” by Im Sang-soo, “Poetry” by Lee Chang-dong and “Dreams Come True” by Kye Yun-sik are also among the 20 films chosen.

The films will be screened more than three times a day, and foreign fans will be invited to special events designed to help increase their understanding of Korean film, officials said.

“The English subtitle program will help boost foreigners’ understanding of Korean culture and improve Seoul’s image as foreigner-friendly,” said Ma Chae-sook, a culture official at the Seoul government.

The city government is also planning to include subtitles in other foreign languages, including Chinese and Japanese, in the second half of this year, the official said.

PRESS: INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE TO SPEAK ON GLOBAL WEB MARKETING IN BERLIN



Leading global airline KLM will be among the companies taking part in the International Search Summit in Berlin on 7th June.
Date Released: 04/28/2010
Press Release ImageIris Cremers, head of user experience, content and self-assist at KLM, will be explaining how KLM maintains a consistent brand image across all online channels for their 116 country websites. She will talk about how KLM tries to enhance customer experience by combining global and local content and share some best practices.
Other speakers at the conference, which is aimed at marketers involved in managing and implementing global online marketing activity, include Andy Atkins-Krüger of WebCertain, Dixon Jones from MajesticSEO, Thomas Bindl from RefinedLabs and Florian Stelzner, currently SEO Manager at Xing.
Sessions at the International Search Summit include International Link Building, Top 10 Essentials for International SEO Success, Global Content Management and International PPC – Optimising the Longtail.
The Summit will end with a Global Site Clinic, a session where delegates can ask a panel of experts questions related to their own websites and get specific advice on how to improve their websites or campaigns.
Andy Atkins-Krüger, whose multilingual search marketing agency WebCertain runs the Summit says, “More and more companies are using the web to target new business in new markets, but are unsure how to do it. By bringing together a group of speakers with extensive experience in working across many countries and languages, such as KLM, the Summit provides delegates with solutions to their global web marketing problems, as well as new ideas for improving their international online presence.”
The International Search Summit has been running in London since 2008, covering a range of SEO, PPC and Social Media topics, all from an international perspective. The event in Berlin is running alongside the Localization World conference.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Internet News and Translation


Gemma Birch

WebCertain.com
Specialist in online marketing, seo and ppc

Tweet In Local Language To Ensure Worldwide Twitter Success


Twitter, like Facebook before it, has become a global phenomenon. The company recently said on itsblog that over 60% of Twitter users are based outside the United States and it now provides its interface in French, German, Italian, Spanish and Japanese – with more languages likely to follow.

Twitter said that introducing different language versions dramatically increased the number of users signing up from countries speaking those languages – and just as people search predominantly in their own language, they tweet in it too.

Therefore, global organisations need to implement a multilingual Twitter strategy if they intend to use the medium to promote their brands in non-English speaking markets. Leading hotels brandHotels.com did just that, and SEO manager Oscar Carreras will be sharing their experiences at theInternational Search Summit on 13th May in London.

Here Oscar gives a brief insight into his experiences of international SEO and running multilingual Twitter campaigns.

If you could give just one tip to search marketers working on global campaigns, what would it be?

Work on proper website localisation with SEO in mind and leverage the power of the flagship site in order to pass value onto the foreign sites.

Why should global brands include Twitter as part of their marketing strategy?

Global brands should test Twitter as a brand awareness and cheap market research. Not all marktees are going to be receptive to the use of Twitter, which is why testing is crucial.

What was your biggest challenge when implementing an international Twitter campaign for Hotels.com?#

To coordinate marketing managers, external agencies, time zones and tools. It is crucial to test the procedures beforehand and analyse what tools are going to help and then train the different offices – ensuring that specific market nuances are taken into account.

Is it effective to just use Twitter in English, even when targeting non-English speaking markets?

No, we tested this and English tweets were usually responded only by English users.

Are there any Twitter applications/platforms that are particularly useful in international campaigns?

We don’t use any tools which are specifically tailor made for international campaigns. Tweedeck is a useful tool as several people can interact and create output into a single Twitter account. Bit.ly is useful tracking tool.

What value do you think the International Search Summit offers delegates?

The International Search Summit is a unique conference because it addresses a niche area of SEO that affects most big online brands. That level of expertise at that granular level is usually difficult to find at more general SEO conferences.

The International Search Summit in May is looking at innovations – recent developments in search and social media which are changing online marketing. In your opinion, what is the most significant innovation in recent years?

Unfortunately, the most significant innovation in terms of SEO, in my opinion, is the inclusion of behavioural data in Google’s algorithm. Brand engagement with the end user is going to become more essential in the future – making our job as internet marketers much harder as a result.

Language Training in US Military

From Languagelog.com

April 25, 2010 @ 8:41 pm

Following up on earlier LL posts about language training in the U.S. military (e.g. "The interpreter shortage", 10/17/2005; "Linguistics in 1940", 3/11/2007) Jim Gordon sent a pointer to Roger Dingman's Deciphering the Rising Sun: Navy and Marine Corps Codebreakers, Translators and Interpreters in the Pacific War, Naval Institute Press, 2009. From a review by Ian Nish at the Japan Society:

Professor Dingman has based this enlightening study on extended interviews with former officers in the US Navy and Marine Corps who are now in their upper 80s. But he has also made much use of the unpublished memoirs to be found in the Navy Language School Collection in the Norlin Library, University of Colorado at Boulder where they were trained. It is a tribute to the US government – and the British for that matter – that they appreciated the importance of training linguists during the Asia-Pacific war and had the foresight to recruit and train personnel not of Japanese ancestry to study the Japanese language with a view to serving as language officers. Dingman concludes that it was a successful experiment and draws a painful parallel with the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq:

“In June 2002 America teetered on the cusp of a war in Iraq that has lasted longer than the titanic struggle which the World War II language officers fought… It led to swift military victory, but true peace has proven elusive in the disastrously mismanaged, occupation that followed… those in our armed forces charged with carrying out their orders lacked knowledge of Iraq’s history and culture and of the language of its people. (pp. 249-50)”

While there's no question that more interpreters would have been better, I wonder whether deficiencies in military language training bear any significant responsibility for the well-documented problems in managing the American occupation of Iraq. And I also wonder whether the good qualities of the Navy Language School in the 1940s were critical to the success of the American occupation of Japan.

In the first place, I'm fairly certain that the Defense Language Institute graduated many more people from its Arabic programs during (say) 2001-2003 than the Navy Language School graduated from its Japanese program between July 1943 (when the first class finished) to August 1945 (when the U.S. occupation of Japan began). And on the second place, I believe that the U.S. occupation of Japan ended up being mainly managed by the Army rather than the Navy. Certainly Douglas MacArthur was Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces.

For a picture of what the American occupation was like from a linguistic point of view, I can recommend J. Marshall Ungar's Literacy and Script Reform in Occupation Japan: Reading Between the Lines, OUP 1966, and (if you can find it) Robert King Hall Jr.'sEducation for a New Japan, Yale University Press, 1949. In particular, it's interesting to follow their description of the argument over whether to force a switch away from kanji ("Chinese chararcters") to the exclusive use of kana (syllabary) or romanization. Although the intellectual and political arguments were complex ones, my impression is that overall, Americans in the military who were better trained in Japanese language and culture (like Hall, who was one of the Navy's Japanese experts) tended to be on the anti-kanji side of the debate. The (pro-kanji) winners of the argument were, I think, basically following MacArthur's general policy of leaving the Japanese governmental bureaucracy largely in place, and letting it decide most things not seen as central to American interests.

The most relevant criticism of the U.S. military's Arabic language training would not, I think, be the quantity or quality of Arabic-language students, but rather a decision made a long before the first Gulf War about what language to teach them. Rather than learning one of the various regional colloquial versions of Arabic, students were only taught Modern Standard Arabic. From a linguistic point of view, that's roughly like teaching people Latin and then sending them to duty stations in France, Italy, Spain, and Portugal.

I was once told by someone at DLI that they used to teach several different "colloquials", but found that the various military branches were not able to keep the differences straight, and would assign someone who had learned Moroccan Arabic to the gulf, or vice versa, so that DLI gave up and went with MSA alone, since that's the standard written form which students need to learn anyhow. According to the website of the DLI's Middle Eastern Schools, they now once again teach Levantine, Egyptian, and Iraqi "dialects", "in the third semester of instruction, after students have gained a solid foundation in MSA".

Anyhow, none of this detracts from the interest of Dingman's history, which I've ordered and look forward to reading.

[Update — there is some interesting and useful discussion at The Volokh Conspiracy.]

Census and Language Barriers

Vietnamese Elders Overcome Isolation,

Language Barriers to Be Counted in Census


From: New America Media, Jacob Simas and Vivian Po, Posted: Apr 25, 2010

Editor’s note: Since the end of March, the Census Bureau has been tracking mail-in response rates to the 2010 Census questionnaire, and posting daily updates on their Web site, www.census.gov. Although the national response rate is now above 70 percent, certain pockets of the country –- primarily low-income and ethnic communities –- are participating at a far lower rate. One example is the Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco, where as of April 23 only 50 percent of all households had returned a census form. New America Media went to the Tenderloin to interview some of the neighborhood’s “hardest to count” community members -– immigrant elders living in SRO hotels and subsidized apartments –- who managed to be counted in the decennial census, despite substantial obstacles.

Vietnamese Elders Overcome Isolation, Language Barriers to Complete Census from New America Media on Vimeo.


Related Articles:

Immigrants More Trusting of Census than U.S.-Born Latinos

Census to Count Arabs as White, Despite Write-In Campaign

Census Reaches Out to American Indians, But Gaps Remain